In recent decades, there has been an increase in male infertility. According to various statistics, the male factor in the structure of infertile marriages is already 50-60%. An analysis of the world literature has shown that men with various types of pathozo-ospermia have a significantly increased risk of sper-matozoa aneuploidy, and therefore embryonic ane-uploidy, even in assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs. Along with this, when studying the results of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in men with vari-ous forms of pathozoospermia, low rates of preg-nancy and a higher frequency of reproductive losses were found compared to couples in which men had normal spermograms. The study included 325 coup-les with male factor infertility who applied to the Central Clinic of Baku for the period from 2008 to 2020 for in vitro fertilization. All patients were divi-ded into 3 groups. Group A consisted of 110 couples with pazoospermia in men who underwent in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Group B included 110 pathozoospermic couples who underwent IVF without PGD (the pati-ents did not consent to PGD). Group C consisted of 105 couples with normal sperm counts who under-went IVF with PGD at their own request. The results obtained in the present study showed that patients with severe pathozoospermia included in IVF treat-ment may have a higher level of sex chromosome aneuploidy in embryos than patients with moderate pathozoospermia. Proper and thorough genetic counseling should be offered to patients with patho-zoospermia, emphasizing the increased risk of sex chromosome aneuploidy in their offspring and the importance of PGD in preventing this potential risk. FISH analysis is a fast, reliable and relatively inex-pensive method for assessing sex chromosomal ab-normalities in pre-implantation embryos.
Andersen C.Y., Andersen K.V. Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014; 28(5):552-9.
Burnik Papler T., Vrtacnik Bokal E., Maver A., Lovrecic L. Specific gene expression differences in cumulus cells as potential biomarkers of pregnancy. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2015; 30(4):426-33.
Elsayed G.M., El Assiouty L., El Sobky E.S. The importance of aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities. Springerplus. 2013; 2:490.
Fu W., Lu J., Xu L., Zheng L., Zhang Y., Zhong Y. et al. Applied research of combined G –banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi.2014; 31(6):737-42.
Gregg A.R., Gross S.J., Best R.G., Monaghan K.G., Bajaj K., Skotko B.G. et al. ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Genet. Med. 2013;15(5):395-8.
Leth-Moller K., Hammer Jagd S., Humaidan P. The luteal phase after GnRHa trigger-understanding an enigma. Int.J. Fertil. Steril.2014; 28(3):227-34.
Neyt M., Huistaeri F., Gyselaers W. Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11): e005922.
Ong F.S., Lin J.C., Das K., Grosu D.S., Fan J.B. Translational utility of next-generation sequencing. Genomics. 2013; 102(3):137-9.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline. Fertil. Steril.2016; Sep 24.pii:S0015-0282(16)627-4. doi:10.1016 | j.fertnstert.2016.08.048.
Schatten H., Qing-Yuan Sun, Prather R. The impact of mitochondrial function-dysfunction on IVF and new treatment possibilities for infertility. Reprod. Biol.Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 111.
Schmutzler A.G., Acar-Perk B., Weimer J., Salmassi A., Sievers K., Tobler M. et al. Oocyte morphology on day 0 correlates with aneuploidy as detected by polar body biopsy and FISH. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014; 289(2):445-50.