print ISSN: 2411-3956
Azərbaycanca Русский
The role of the uselessness of the scar in the uterus in premature births
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Actual Questions of Modern Gynecology and Perinatology
Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024)
Original article

The role of the uselessness of the scar in the uterus in premature births

Published: December 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28942/mgpam.v11i3.141

Abstract

Premature birth remains a serious unresolved problem in modern obstetrics. Women with a scarred uterus after undergoing CS are still highly likely to have a subsequent pregnancy, while most of them have uncomplicated pregnancies, which leads to live births on time. Pregnant women with uterine scars may undergo vaginal delivery. However, vaginal delivery after CS remains a controversial topic: there is insufficient reliable data that could help doctors and women in labor determine the best option for delivery during subsequent pregnancy. There are many factors that affect the impossibility of delivery, more attention should be paid to all aspects of the examination and the method of application should be chosen strictly in accordance with the indications.

References

Morlando M, Conte A, Schiattarella A. Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2023; 91: 102362. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102362

Wang S, Hu Q, Liao H, Wang K, Yu H. Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancy in Women with Scarred Uteri. Int J Womens Health. 2023;15:1453-1465. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S422187.

Yapan P, Wanitpongpan P, Sripang N. Association between lower uterine wall thickness measured at 18-22 weeks of gestation and risk of Preterm Birth: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04902-w.

Berghella V, Palacio M, Ness A, Alfirevic Z, Nicolaides KH, Saccone G. Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):322-329. doi: 10.1002/uog.17388.

Boelig RC, Kripalu V, Chen SL, Cruz Y, Amanda R, Berghella V. Utility of follow-up cervical length screening in low-risk women with a cervical length of 26 to 29 mm. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; 225(2): 179.e1-179.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.027.

Ye R, Wang W, Li J. Analysis of high risk factors for complications in the trial of vaginal delivery due to uterine scarring in a subsequent pregnancy to a cesarean section. Invest Clin 2022; 63 (3): 235–242. doi: 10.54817/IC.v63n3a03

Haq C. Remembrances and Reflections: global health, local needs, and one very special patient. Fam Med. 2016; 48(1):64-65.

Николаева Е.И., Сулима А.Н. Особенности родоразрешения беременных с рубцом на матке. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2023;43(2):54–60. doi: 10.18699/SSMJ20230205

Мудров В.А., Мочалова М.Н., Мудров А.А. Особенности родоразрешения беременных с рубцом на матке через естественные родовые пути на современном этапе. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2018:67(1):126–37. doi: 10.17816/JOWD67126-37

Sholapurkar SL. Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2018; 10(3):166-173. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3271w

Visser L, Slaager C, Kazemier BM, Rietveld AL, Oudijk MA, de Groot CJM, et al. Risk of preterm birth after prior term cesarean. BJOG. 2020;127(5):610-617. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16083

Zafman KB, Stone JL, Factor SH. Trends in characteristics of women choosing contraindicated home births. J Perinat Med 2018; 46(6):573-577. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0029.

Németh G, Molnár A. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in light of international opinions. Orv Hetil 2017; 158(30):1168-1174. doi: 10.1556/650.2017.30810.

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 184: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130(5):e217-e233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398.

Morton M, Fredericks Ch, Yon R, Nagy K, Bokhari Faran. Damage control laparotomy for uterine rupture following attempted vaginal birth after cesarean. Am Surg 2016; 82(7): 140-141.

Silva B, Pinto PV, Costa MA. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2023; 288: 36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030

Reicher L, Fouks Y, Yogev Y. Cervical Assessment for Predicting Preterm Birth-Cervical Length and Beyond. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):627. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040627.

PDF (Azərbaycanca)
PDF (Azərbaycanca)

Keywords

: premature birth, uterine scar, cesarean section, sonography, cervical canal, lower uterine wall vaxtından əvvəl doğuş, uşaqlıq yolunda çapıq, keysəriyyə əməliyyatı, ultrasəs, uşaqlıq boynu kanalı, uşaqlığın aşağı divarı преждевременные роды, рубец на матке, кесарево сечение, сонография, цервикальный канал, нижняя стенка матки

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>