Yumurtalıqların stimullaşdırılması protokolları aşağı yumurtalıq ehtiyatı olan xəstələr və Duostim protokolu

I.I. Huseynova

doi:10.28942/mgpam.v8i4.101

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021)

Original article

Luteal phase ovarian stimulasion for poor ovarian responders and Duostim protocol

Published: July 18, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28942/mgpam.v8i4.101

Abstract

Among patients with infertility, patients with low ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation predominate. The article explains the advantages of luteal phase stimulation over follicular phase stimulation in such patients based on the literature.
Twice stimulation in a single cycle in a short period of time - the results of the Duostim protocol are more promising. There is a great need to study perinatal and postnatal outcomes in the future.

References

Danilo Cimadomo, Alberto Vaiarelli, Silvia Colamaria et al. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle // Human Reproduction, Volume 33, Issue 8, August 2018, Pages 1442–1448, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey

Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Cobellis L, Greco E. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 10:235–246. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60946-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(6):1253–66.

Wei Zhang,1 Meimei Wang, Shuang Wang, Hongchu Bao, Qinglan Qu, Ning Zhang and Cuifang Hao1. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders 2018

John Zhang. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders? 2015.

Joaquín Llácer, Belén Moliner, Lydia Luque, Andrea Bernabéu, Belén Lledó, Juan Carlos Castillo, Jaime Guerrero, Jorge Ten & Rafael Bernabéu. Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial, 2020.

Kuang Y, Hong Q, Chen Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014b; 101:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] 30 Müasir ginekologiya və perinatologiyanın aktual məsələləri 08 №04/2021

Li-HongWei1Wen-HongMa1NiTangJi-HongWei. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study, 2016.

Justin Rashtian& John Zhangphase. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation increases the number of mature oocytes in older women with severe diminished ovarian reserve. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2018 Jun;64(3):216-21

Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt P, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ, IMPORT study group Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19:26–36. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms041.

Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26:2532–2540. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der228.

ESHRE-the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embriology guidelines.

Cardoso MCA, Evangelista A, Sartório C, Vaz G, Werneck CLV, Guimarães FM, Sá PG, Erthal MC. Can ovarian double-stimulation in the same menstrual cycle improve IVF outcomes? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017; 21:217–221. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170042.

Choi B, Bosch E, Lannon BM, Leveille MC, Wong WH, Leader A, Pellicer A, Penzias AS, Yao MW. Personalized prediction of first-cycle in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99:1905–1911. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.016.

Cohen J, Alikani M. The time has come to radically rethink assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27:323–324. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.001.

Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: The Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26:1616–1624. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092.

Kryou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlazis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007; 91:749–766. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert, 2007.12.077.

Moffat R, Pirtea P, Gayet V, Wolf JP, Chapron C, de Ziegler D. Dual ovarian stimulation is a new viable option for enhancing the oocyte yield when the time for assisted reproductive technology is limited. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29:659–661. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.010.

Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril. 2011; 96:1058–1061.: e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048.

van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16:57–89. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq015.

Luteal phase ovarian stimulasion for poor ovarian responders and Duostim protocol

Abstract

References

Keywords

Most read articles by the same author(s)