print ISSN: 2411-3956
The main ultrasound signs of fetal intrauterine growth restriction
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Actual Questions of Modern Gynecology and Perinatology

Abstract

The article presents the results of the review of modern literature data on ultrasound diagnosis of fetal intrauterine growth restriction. Contemporary ideas about intrauterine growth restriction are also reviewed. Ultrasound biometry of the fetus is the
cornerstone to detect its growth disorders. Most researchers believe that 36 weeks or later is the most effective time frame for ultrasound measurements, and that abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight, along with gestational age, are the best predictors of newborn body mass index. Several ultrasound markers have been shown to predict intrauterine growth restriction, including uterine artery Doppler, placental morphology, and placental volumes. The effectiveness of the screening test was reviewed.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction. Practice Bulletin no. 12, 2000, Washington DC. http://www.acog.org. Accessed 25 Dec 2012.

Farina A. Systematic review on first trimester three-dimensional placental volumetry predicting small for gestational age infants. Prenatal Diagn. 2016; 36(2): 135-141. doi: 10.1002/pd.4754

Baer RJ, Rogers EE, Partridge JC, Anderson JG, Morris M, Kuppermann M. et al. Population-based risks of mortality and preterm morbidity by gestational age and birth weight. J. Perinatol. 2016;

(11): 1008–13. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.118

Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC, Pell JP, Sattar N, Lawlor DA. et al. Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(1): e1002228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002228

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/ investigation-and-management-small-gestational-age-fetus-green-top-31. Published November 1, 2002. Accessed 25 Dec 2012.

Киосов АФ. Проблемы определения понятия задержки внутриутробного роста и диагностики этой патологии. Доктор.Ру. 2020; 19(3): 6–11. doi: 10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-3-6-11

Suhag A, Berghella V. Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR): Etiology and Diagnosis. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2013; 2:102–111. doi:10.1007/s13669-013-0041-z

Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, Athanasiadis A, Mecacci F, Figueras F. et al. FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: Best practice advice for

screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021; 152(51): 3-57. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13522

Beune IM, Bloomfield FH, Ganzevoort W, Embleton ND, Rozance PJ, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG. et al. Consensus based definition of growth restriction in the newborn. J. Pediatr. 2018; 196: 71–6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.059

Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 219(5): 474.e1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.011

Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: Population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f108

Mayer C, Joseph KS. Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol actions Search in PubMed Search in NLM Catalog Add to Search. 2013;41(2):136-45. doi: 10.1002/uog.11204

Lees CC, Romero R, Stampalija T, Dall'Asta A, DeVore GA, Prefumo F. et al. Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;226(3):366-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1357

Levytska K, Higgins M, Keating S, Melamed N, Walker M, Sebire NJ. et al. Placental pathology in relation to uterine artery doppler findings in pregnancies with severe intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal umbilical artery doppler changes. Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34(5): 451-457. doi: 10.1055/s-

-1592347

Benítez MA, Vargas PM, Manzanares GS. Ultrasound and Biochemical First Trimester Markers as

Predictive Factors for Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; Cases Rev 4:109. doi:

23937/2377-9004/1410109

Ahmed RN, Refaat MM, Shalaan A. Role of ultrasound and color flow doppler in diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction. Benha Medical Journal. 2021; 38(2): 725-740. doi: 10.21608/BMFJ.2021.16924.1056

Milner J, Arezina J. The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: a systematic review. Ultrasound. 2018; 26(1): 32- 41. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17732807

Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G. et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S): S619-S629. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010

Tarca AL, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Erez O, Hernandez-Andrade E, Yeo L. et al. A new customized

fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S): S679-S691.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.229

Pacora P, Romero R, Jung E, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Musilova I. et al. Reduced fetal

growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(6):942-952. doi: 10.1002/uog.23111

Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pacora P, Benshalom-Tirosh N. et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(2):177-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.20299

Rafique Z, Awan M, Iqbal S, Usmani NN, Ahmad M, Amjad M. et al. The Ability of Ultrasound Sonography (USG) to Detect Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy with the Gold Standard of IUGR (Parameters by USG Hadlock) as a Diagnostic Criterion. Cureus. 2021;13(12): e20523. doi:10.7759/cureus.20523

Akolekar R, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu A, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391

Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258

Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of large-forgestational- age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):326-333. doi: 10.1002/uog.20377

Lee KS, Kim HY, Lee SJ, Kwon SO, Na S, Hwang HS. et al. Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research Group. Prediction of newborn's body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5

Moraitis AA, Shreeve N, Sovio U, Brocklehurst P, Heazell AEP, Thornton JG. et al. Universal thirdtrimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003190

Smith GC, Moraitis AA, Wastlund D, Thornton JG, Papageorghiou A, Sanders J. et al. Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25(15):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25150

Ma Y, Li C, Wang Y, Zhang H. Prenatal Prediction of Fetal Growth Restriction and Postnatal Outcomes by Ultrasound Assessment of Fetal Myocardial Performance Index and Blood Flow Spectrum. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;5; 2022:4234137. doi: 10.1155/2022/4234137

Drouin O, Boutin A, Paquette K, Gasse C, Guerby P, Demers S. et al. First-trimester uterine artery doppler for the prediction of SGA at birth: the great obstetrical syndromes study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018; 40(12): 1592-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.004

Rodriguez A, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO. First-, second-, and third-trimester screening for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Lab Med. 2016; 36(2): 331-351. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.007

Toal M, Keating S, Machin G, Dodd J, Adamson S.L, Windrim R.C. et al. Determinants of adverse perinatal outcome in high-risk women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler images. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(3): 330.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.031

Florido J, Ocon O, del Castillo L, Vega-Cañadas J, Manrique-Espinoza N, Navarrete L. Analysis of measurement process of placental volume in early pregnancy: an inter observer reliability study. J Perinat Med. 2014; 42(5): 559-564. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0241

PDF (Azərbaycanca)
PDF (Azərbaycanca)

Keywords

fetal intrauterine growth restriction
diagnosis
ultrasound examination
biometry
dopplerography
gestational age
abdominal circumference fetal inkişaf
diaqnostika
ultrasəs tədqiqat
biometrik
doppleroqrafiya
hamiləlik yaşı
qarın ətrafı задержка внутриутробного развития плода
диагностика
ультразвуковое исследование
биометрия
допплерография
срок беременности
окружность живота

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>