print ISSN: 2411-3956
Diagnostic value of ultrasound and the choice of surgical intervention in patients with benign neoplasms of the ovaries in the postmenopausal period
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Actual Questions of Modern Gynecology and Perinatology

Abstract

Objective: to study the diagnostic value of ultrasound in benign ovarian tumors in the postmenopausal period and to determine the method and volume of surgical interventions. Material and methods of research. 23 patients with benign ovarian tumors in the postmenopausal period from the period of 2016 to 2017 were examined. Examination of patients with benign ovarian tumors revealed that the average age of patients was 62.3 ± 1.1 (49-67). The duration of menopause was 11.0±1.5 (4-18) years. The average age of menopause was 50.0 ± 1.0 (43-54) years. Clinical, hormonal, biochemical and radiological methods were studied in all postmenopausal patients with benign ovarian tumors, the severity of menopausal syndrome was evaluated on the Kupperman scale. Along with this the severity of subjective manifestations, and the menstrual and generative function were studied. The results of the study. As a result of the study, it was found out that patients with benign ovarian tumors in the postmenopausal period showed a statistically significant increase in the anteroposterior size (51.7 ± 4.8 mm) of the uterus and endometrial thickness (5.5 ± 0.9 mm), as well as a statistically significant increase in both ovaries, which suggests the presence of neoplastic processes in one or another ovary, but does not allow to accurately determine the nature of the tumor process, which is the indication for additional research methods. Surgery prevailed in benign ovarian tumors in the postmenopausal period - 82.6% (in 19) performed by standart laparatomy. Meanwhile in ovarian tumors of small and moderate sizes endoscopic operations were favored - 17.4% (in 4), because of their low trauma incidence and a short recovery period.

References

Косьяненко С.Н. Современные аспекты использования онкомаркеров в диагностике опухолей яичников // Онкология на заметку лекарю, 2012, т.12АСu, с.42-43.

Alcázar J.L., Guerriero A., Laparte C., Ajossa S. Diagnostic performance of transvaginal gray-scale ultrasound for specific diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts in relation to menopausal status // Maturitas., 2011, №68, p.182-188.

Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Uccella S., Bogani G., Serati M., Bolis P. Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial // Am.J.Obstet.Gynecol., 2012, vol.207, №112, p.1–6.

Guerriero S., Alcazar J.L., Pascual M.A. Diagnosis of the most frequent benign ovarian cysts: is ultrasonography accurate and reproducible? // J. Womens Health., 2009, №18, p.519-527.

Heilbrun M.E., Olpin J., Shaaban A. Imaging of benign adnexal masses: characteristic presentations on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging // Clin.Obstet.Gynecol., 2009, №52, p.21-39.

Sharma A., Gentry-Maharaj A., Burnell M., Fourkala E.O. Assessing the malignant potential of ovarian inclusion cysts in postmenopausal women within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a prospective cohort study // BJOG: A Int.J. Obstet.Gynaecol., 2011, vol.119, №2, p.1-33.

Sokalska A., Timmerman D., Testa A.C. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses // Ultrasound Obstet.Gynecol., 2009, №34, p.462-470.

Stratton J.F., Tidy J.A., Paterson M.E. The surgical management of ovarian cancer // Cancer.Treat.Rev., 2001, №27, p.111–118.

Timmerman D., Ameye L., Fischerova D., Epstein E., Melis G.B. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group // BMJ, 2010, №341, p.6839.

Uccella S., Cromi A., Bogani G., Casarin J., Serati M., Ghezzi F. Transvaginal specimen extraction at laparoscopy without concomitant hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature// J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2013, №20, p.583–590.

Van Calster B., Timmerman D., Valentin L., McIndoe A. Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group protocol // BJOG, 2012, №119, p.662–671.

Van Holsbeke C., Daemen A., Yazbek J. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition // Gynecol.Obstet. Invest., 2009, №69, p.160-168.

Van Holsbeke C., Van Calster B., Bourne T., Ajossa S., Testa A.C. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses // Clin. Cancer. Res., 2012, №18, p.815–825.

Zanatta A, Rosin MM, Gibran L. Laparoscopy as the most effective tool for management of postmenopausal complex adnexal masses when expectancy is not advisable // J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2012, №19, p.554–561

PDF (Русский)
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

postmenopausal period
benign ovarian tumors
transvaginal ultrasound
hysterectomy postmenopozal dövr
yumurtalığın xoşxassəli şişləri
transvaginal ultrasəs
uşaqlığın ekstripasiyası постменопаузальный период
доброкачественные опухоли яичников
трансвагинальный ультразвук
экстирпация матки