print ISSN: 2411-3956
Respiratory support in premature infants in the intensive care unit
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Actual Questions of Modern Gynecology and Perinatology

Abstract

Objective - to assess the impact of a non-invasive approach to mechanical ventilation (ALV) and compare the intubation rate, the use of exogenous surfactants and the duration of hospitalization, the incidence of complications in preterm infants with a gestational age of 28 to 32 weeks using the "early CPAP" protocol and without. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the cards of 240 children aged ≤35 weeks was carried out. Various methods of artificial lung ventilation were used in the intensive care unit. A prospective analysis of the use of the "early CPAP" protocol was carried out in 46 newborns of gestational age 28-32 weeks, the results of which were compared with the data of 30 newborns of comparable age (comparison group) who received intensive therapy not according to the "early CPAP" protocol. Results. A retrospective analysis showed
that at <28 weeks of prematurity, two-level nasal CPAP was the main regimen used. In preterm infants at 28-31 weeks, continuous positive airway pressure was often used through nasal cannulas. Premature infants aged 32 to 35 weeks used moistened and warm high-flow nasal prongs the longest. Prospective analysis Significant differences between the main group and the control group in terms of the frequency of intubation (p=0.006), the number of days of invasive mechanical ventilation (p=0.013), the use of surfactant (p=0.035), the days of hospital stay (p=0.023) and the rate of complications (p=0.026). Conclusion The results of the study confirm the benefits of using early CPAP and point to an innovative aspect, namely its use for preterm infants between 28 and 32 weeks’ gestational age, in addition to the use of short binasal prongs as an interface of
choice and intermediate levels of CPAP.

References

Wyckoff M.H., Aziz K., Escobedo M.B., Kapadia V.S., Kattwinkel J., Perlman J.M., et al. Part 13: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulationю 2015; 132: S543-60.

doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267

Shi Y., Muniraman H., Biniwale M., Ramanathan R. A Review on Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Management of Respiratory Distress in Extremely Preterm Infants. Front. Pediatr. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00270

Gibu C.K., Cheng P.Y., Ward R.J., Castro B., Heldt G.P. Feasibility and physiological effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants. Pediatr Res. (2017) 82:650-7. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.100

Polglase G.R., Miller S.L., Barton S.K., Kluckow M., Gill A.W., Hooper S.B., et al. Respiratory support for premature neonates in the delivery room: effects on cardiovascular function and the development of brain injury. Pediatr Res. 2014; 75:682–8. doi:10.1038/pr.2014.40

Khabbache K., Hennequin Y., Vermeylen D., Van Overmeire B. Current respiratory support practices in premature infants: an observational study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2021; 39:66. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.66.14482

Vieira B., Souza T.R., Paschoal L.N., Magalhães M.R., Magalhães C.M., Parreira V.F. Early CPAP protocol in preterm infants with gestational age between 28 and 32 weeks: experience of a public hospital. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(4):421-427. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.09.001

Sweet D., Bevilacqua G., Carnielli V., Greisen G., Plavka R., Saugstad O.D., et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(3):175-86. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.048

Morley C.J., Davis P.G., Doyle L.W. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. New England J Med Surg Collat Branches Sci. 2008; 358:700-708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788

SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Finer NN, Carlo WA. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1970-1979. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783

Dunn M.S., Kaempf J., de Klerk A. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011; 128:1069–1076. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3848

Neeraj G., Shiv S.S., Srinivas M., Praveen K. Continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates: an update of current evidence and implications for developing countries. Indian Pediatr. 2015; 52:319–328. doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0632-z

Zhang H., Zhang J., Zhao S. Airway damage of prematurity: the impact of prolonged intubation, ventilation, and chronic lung disease. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(4):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.04.001

Buzzella B., Claure N., D’Ugard C. A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014; 164:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.040

Gupta N., Saini S.S., Murki S. Continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates: an update of current evidence and implications for developing countries. Indian Pediatr. 2015; 52:319-328. doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0632-z

Goel S., Mondkar J., Panchal H. Nasal mask versus nasal prongs for delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015; 52:1035-1040. doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0769-9

PDF (Русский)
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

premature newborns
mechanical ventilation
CPA
intubation
surfactant vaxtından əvvəl doğulmuş yenidoğulmuşlar
mexaniki ventilyasiya
CPAP
intubasiya
surfaktant недоношенные новорожденные
ИВЛ
интубация
назальный СРАР
сурфактант